Justiça restaurativa para povos e comunidades tradicionais: reflexões em torno de caso envolvendo a TI Katxuyana-Tunayana e o TQ Cachoeira Porteira
Fecha
2023-10-06Autor
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1835646017008612
MOURA, Isabel Rodrigues
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemResumen
This research starts from the observation of the dynamics and complexity of
territorial conflicts that present consequences of agrarian, land, socio-environmental
nature, minorities, among others, as well as the observation of the territorial
ordering and power relations that permeate conflict scenarios in the Amazon.
Through the study of the case involving the overlap of the Quilombola Territory of
Cachoeira Porteira and the Katxuyana-Tunayana Indigenous Land, I sought to
analyze the conflict through the theoretical framework of Restorative Justice in order
to answer the following question: To what extent do the practices adopted in the
case involving the Can TI Katxuyana-Tunayana and TQ Cachoeira Porteira indicate
the appropriateness of using restorative practices in dealing with conflicts involving
traditional peoples and communities in the Amazon? The use of theoretical
methodological sport of social sciences, involving contributions from social
anthropology, political geography and law, and also the bibliographic-documentary
survey of literature pertinent to Restorative Justice, socio-environmental conflicts,
territorialities and power relations developed to build the interdisciplinary approach
of this research and to achieve the general objective: to investigate the conditions
and possibilities of applying the restorative approach in the management and
treatment of conflicts involving traditional peoples and communities in the Lower
Amazon Region. Upon completing this research, I ratified and rectified hypotheses,
presenting notes at the end on the restorative approach in conflict scenarios
involving traditional peoples and communities. In summary, it is concluded that
Restorative Justice is not only ‘for’ traditional peoples and communities, but ‘comes’
from them. These are people who have significant experiences in managing and
dealing with their conflicts, experiences that must be heard, valued and referenced.