Judicialização do direito à saúde: um estudo da assistência farmacêutica na região metropolitana de Santarém - PA
Visualizar/ Abrir
Data
2022-12-20Autor
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5757625449046790
AZEVEDO, Ludimilla Dayara Peleja
Metadata
Mostrar registro completoResumo
This dissertation aims to analyze the phenomenon of judicialization of the right to
health, especially with regard to the supply of medicines, in the Court of Justice of the
State of Pará - Comarca de Santarém, headquarters of the metropolitan region of
Santarém, in the west of Pará. The study precedes an interdisciplinary approach, which
rescues the historical conception of health, the evolution of fundamental social rights;
it deals with the right to health; the Unified Health System and seeks to elucidate the
elements involved in the phenomenon of judicialization of health in the provision of
pharmaceutical care. This is a bibliographic and documentary study, with a mixed
quantitative and qualitative approach. The bibliographic research was developed from
a Systematic Literature Review (RSL) in the scopus database of works related to
judicialization, right to health and supply of medicines. The documentary research is
exploratory and descriptive, applying the content analysis of Bardin (2017) for the
treatment of data produced from legal proceedings in the District of Santarém in the
period between 2018 and 2021, the sample has 34 analyzed processes, in which it
was possible to present some characteristics, among them: predominance of individual
litigation; curative focus of demands; tendency to grant early injunction; little mention
of the statements of the National Council of Justice; no prior consultation with the
Technical Advisory Center and predominance of medication requests not covered by
public policies. Data analysis also shows a range of literature focused on research on
the judicialization of the right to health, however, it was concluded that it is necessary
to stimulate a multidisciplinary debate between health managers, medical
professionals and legal practitioners, especially in around the new contours,
discussions and proposals that emerged after the work of the National Council of
Justice, in the sense of promoting the sustainability and rationality of the judicialization
of health. Despite this being a viable alternative for the realization of the individual's
right to health, it is a controversial topic, as it does not effectively reach public health
policies.